Do I need "ranlib" / "ar -s" for static linking?

Question

I did not find any proper information if and why I need ranlib / ar -s for static linking.

Assume I have an application that consists of multiple modules. Each module has its code files in its own folder, and the object files are created in their own folder: module1/%.c → bin/module1/%.o. For each module I create an .a file: ar -rc bin/module1.a bin/module1/….o. The whole program gets compiled with gcc bin/module1.a … moduleN.a -o bin/app.

In this scenario what does creating an index for the .a file do? The compilation and program works just fine even if I don't add indexes to the .a files. But every example that I found called ranlib after the last object file was added to the archive.

The question is not Linux / Mac / Windows specific.

Bailee

Related answer: https://mcmap.net/q/363570/-what-is-the-difference-between-ranlib-ar-and-ld-for-making-libraries – Pennsylvania

Answer 1

From 'Building And Using Static And Shared "C" Libraries': (http://docencia.ac.upc.edu/FIB/USO/Bibliografia/unix-c-libraries.html)

"After an archive is created, or modified, there is a need to index it. This index is later used by the compiler to speed up symbol-lookup inside the library, and to make sure that the order of the symbols in the library won't matter during compilation (this will be better understood when we take a deeper look at the link process at the end of this tutorial)."

Morgan

Answer 2

If you're on a POSIX-compatible system, no. According to the specification:

Whenever the ar utility is used to create or update the contents of such an archive, the symbol table is rebuilt.

The only use for ar -s or ranlib is to rebuild the symbol table after it has been stripped with the strip command.

Tom