Sometimes I have a long list and I would like to check whether a string matches anything in the list.
Use a list, not a Junction:
my @list = <bar bartoo baragain>;
say 'bartoo' ~~ / @list /; # 「bartoo」
say 'bartoo' ~~ / <{<bar bartoo baragain>}> /; # 「bartoo」
Note that by default you get the longest matching token.
I am trying to interpolate a junction inside a regex. They are all errors. ... Does this error message mean that junctions cannot be used inside regex interpolation?
I think so. (The error message is perhaps LTA.) Junctions are a feature of the main P6 language. It seems reasonable that the pattern matching DSL doesn't support them.
The work-around I have is
say "12345" ~~ m/ <{ (2,3,4).join("||") }> /
「2」
If you join with a doubled pipe (||
) then you get the first token that matches rather than the longest:
say 'bartoo' ~~ / <{'bar || bartoo || baragain'}> /; # 「bar」
say 'bartoo' ~~ / ||@list /; # 「bar」
say 'bartoo' ~~ / ||<{<bar bartoo baragain>}> /; # 「bar」
Not specifying the pipe symbol for these constructs is the same as specifying a single pipe symbol (|
) and matches the longest matching token:
say 'bartoo' ~~ / <{'bar | bartoo | baragain'}> /; # 「bartoo」
say 'bartoo' ~~ / |@list /; # 「bartoo」
say 'bartoo' ~~ / |<{<bar bartoo baragain>}> /; # 「bartoo」
You've asked related questions before. I'll add links to a couple of them here for convenience:
so
in front of the junction:say "12345" ~~ m/ <{ so (2,3,4).any }> /
(but I don't think this solves the problem though) – Engineman